Discover more from Clown World - Honk
Yaffa Shir-Raz and Ranit Feinberg expose COVID-19 vaccine harms on babies, as the FDA prepares to authorize it.
Yaffa Shir-Raz is a long time journalist who’s been covering the vaccine and Covid-19 mandates for the past year on her website, Real-Time Magazine. While Yaffa was studying VAERS submissions, she encountered two cases of hemmoraging in babies (ages 1 month and 3 months) who were exposed to the vaccine via breastmilk, and then found a case of a breastfed baby dying after her mother got vaccinated. She asked her colleague Ranit Feinberg to investigate VAERS and see if there were any other reports of babies or children under the 5 year age limit who were adversely affected by the vaccine. Ranit came back to Yaffa with more than FIFTY cases in children up to age 3, many of whom had been vaccinated themselves, as opposed to being exposed through breastmilk. The two of them dug into the data for weeks, and today were able to publish their excellent report.
I urge you all to read Yaffa’s report for yourselves, but meanwhile, here are some of the main points the report raises:
They studied 58 VAERS reports of babies between the ages of newborn - 3 years old. For the purposes of their report, babies who were exposed to the vaccine via breastmilk were excluded. The 58 reports only includes babies who were vaccinated themselves.
The major question this raises is how on EARTH were these babies vaccinated? In most of the reports, the method of vaccination is unknown. In one, it states "unsure if patient was involved in clinical trial” by the author of that report. What’s clear is that there are an unknown number of babies who have illegally received an unauthorized vaccine. At least 58 of them suffered serious adverse events, many of them life-threatening.
The 58 reports studied contain a wide variety of serious medical issues. Most of them conclude with either “outcome unkown” or “not recovered”. The most commonly found adverse events included:
Life threatening bleeding
The FDA released a “briefing document” ahead of the June 15th Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee Meeting regarding amending the EUA for use in children ages 6 months - 4 years. This is what they already know when they declare it “safe and effective” later this week:
Safety: In their very own document they acknowledge 245 US VAERS reports for babies ages 6 months - age 4 with included adverse events such as: “SARS-CoV-2 test, headache, fatigue, COVID-19, pyrexia, dizziness, pain, nausea, pain in extremity, chills, pyrexia, syncope, product storage error, nausea, product administered to patient of inappropriate age, fatigue, chest pain, vomiting, product administered to patient of inappropriate age, exposure via breastmilk, cough, rash, diarrhea.”
Efficacy: In the document, the FDA claims vaccine efficacy of 80.4%. They came to this number from two studies of a total of 1,415 vaccinated babies/toddlers up to age 4. From those 1,415 kids, 10 got Covid-19 with “symptoms”. Broken down by age, 3 from the younger kids and 7 from the older kids, there were slightly more from the vaccine group than from the placebo group. They now claim 80.4% efficacy.
The FDA is meeting this Wednesday to likely rubber stamp an EUA for babies ages 6 months-5 years to get three doses of the Covid-19 vaccine. Putting aside the obvious question of where, exactly, the FDA is finding an “emergency” from Covid in babies with which to justify this authorization, the more urgent issue at hand is safety. This is a war waged by medical tyrants over the future of the world’s babies, and the most important battle in this war is about to take place. We’re at a fevered pitch in terms of giant swathes of information demonstrating the negative fallout from the vaccine that’s available to the public, while at the same pace those at the FDA and Pfizer are closing their eyes, sticking their fingers in their ears and singing “la-la-la-la-la, I can’t hear you”.
It is URGENT that we make more noise than they’ve ever encountered in their decades of closed door deals, buried documents, and regulatory capture of our health institutions. The time for this charade to come to an end is now. If there’s anyone reading this who currently has a time slot to speak at the FDA meeting, please consider using it to create a “culture-jam”, Alex Stein #99 style.
Some sort of witty scheme that will expose the horror and corruption in a manner that will be appealing to viewers and will go viral. We must make them look like the fools they are for continuing this medical tyranny, and turn the pressure up to a point where they’re forced to back down.
The Final Battlecry
There are many out there taking up this call to pushback against the FDA’s attempt to amend the EUA and start vaccinating the babies.
Meryl Nass broke down a letter sent by the Children’s Health Defense organization to the members of the VRBPAC that clearly lays out a case against authorizing the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines for babies.
Toby Rogers dug deep into the Moderna data, a 190 page document that they kindly released 2 business days before the meeting. The board members will be unlikely to have read it, so Dr. Rogers did their work for them.
James Roguski wrote a great Substack about the illegality of issuing an EUA for the Moderna vaccine for children, along with numerous ways to reach out and make your voice heard.
Darby Shaw broke down details of a Moderna report, which is also under review at this week’s meeting.
Battle shields on, because the babies can’t save themselves.