40 Comments

There was someone from the industry a few months ago who said that the manufacturing capacity per year didn't get anywhere near enough vials to vaxx the number of people that had been the suggestion being that the vaxxes were being produced for several years before 2020.

Expand full comment
Mar 11, 2022·edited Mar 11, 2022Liked by Etana Hecht

My son's very health-conscious and trim newlywed millennial teacher (late 20s) was found dead in the school parking lot. Dropped dead. No autopsy. No questions.

Expand full comment
Mar 11, 2022Liked by Etana Hecht

In spite of all the gas lighting and even blatant lies, it would be impossible to know what is truth and what is lies without the amazing people behind the research into the data. We’d all be wondering if we’re cookoo conspiracy theorists, and never have that acknowledgment that our gut feelings were indeed correct. In this crazy world, it’s such a blessing to have the information available, the incredibly smart people to dissect, discern and disseminate it, and the tools (internet, Substack community) to have it spread far and wide. It truly gives me hope for humanity- thank you 🙏

Expand full comment
Mar 11, 2022·edited Mar 20, 2022Liked by Etana Hecht

Spot on, Elena! One of the few good points of the last few years is that they have shown us who are real enemies and friends are. I never thought I'd be a fan of Naomi Wolf (crazy feminist!) or Russell Brand (demonic nutcase!), but both have shown their true colours. Bravo to them, to you and to the millions who will see this through until justice is done!

Expand full comment
Mar 11, 2022Liked by Etana Hecht

I didn't see any mention of the CDC document stating that cominarty isn't available in the US...

https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/programs/iis/COVID-19-related-codes.html

in the chart under this text:

"The following vaccines and associated tradenames have been approved by the FDA under BLA License. They are listed separately because while they may represent the same formulations as the EUA authorized and labeled products listed above, the NDCs listed with the new BLA licensed tradenames in the FDA BLA approval or the FDA Structured Product Labels (SPL) are not currently being produced by the manufacturers while EUA product is available."

cominarty specific quote, though the moderna "licensed" spikevax variant is in the same chart

"COMINARTY products are not orderable at this time. NDCs are listed per FDA Structured Product Label (SPL) document for the BLA licensed product. These codes are not included in CDC Vaccine Code Set files at this time. Pfizer has provided the following statement regarding the COMINARTY branded NDCs and labels:

“Pfizer received FDA BLA license on 8/23/2021 for its COVID-19 vaccine for use in individuals 16 and older (COMIRNATY). At that time, the FDA published a BLA package insert that included the approved new COVID-19 vaccine tradename COMIRNATY and listed 2 new NDCs (0069-1000-03, 0069-1000-02) and images of labels with the new tradename.

Pfizer subsequently received approval to amend its FDA BLA License on December 16, 2021 to include its tris-sucrose formulation COVID-19 vaccine for use in individuals 16 and older (COMIRNATY). At that time, the FDA published a BLA package insert that included the approved new COVID-19 vaccine tradename COMIRNATY and listed 3 new NDCs (0069-2025-10, 0069-2025-25, 0069-2025-01) and images of labels with the new tradename.

At present, Pfizer does not plan to produce any product with these new NDCs and labels over the next few months while EUA authorized product is still available and being made available for U.S. distribution. As such, the CDC, AMA, and drug compendia may not publish these new codes until Pfizer has determined when the product will be produced with the BLA labels.”"

Expand full comment
Mar 11, 2022·edited Mar 11, 2022Liked by Etana Hecht

The shenanigans of Cominarty -thx for checking if this is still happening. OMG. It is. I hope pharmacies will be sued for duping people. The stupid sheep think they are getting a "must be safe, it's approved" jab and of course the PHARMICISTS KNOW this is a CDC play on words TRICK. / /Also, thank you for this .. Spike in sudden Goog death searches - wow, that is interesting. Can you imagine, your friend collapes dead and you search Sudden Death. Probably because NoOne in your "trust circle" will admit it's linked to the JABS. Many are searching for the TRUTH is what that says to me. Sadly, if they Googl'd - they Still won't find the Truth.

Expand full comment

Yes, many people have known this since the day they were released. Furthermore, they are purported to be identical, only "legally distinct." However, we are forbidden to take the EUA shots to the lab independently to assess the ingredients. Why is that? Why would we trust that assertion when we know they've been lying to us all along?

Expand full comment
Mar 15, 2022·edited Mar 15, 2022Liked by Etana Hecht

I think it's worth mentioning that Google search results around "died suddenly" are being manipulated. I can say this with some certainty due to numerous searches I started doing on the term starting in early- to mid-2021. The search term really started to spike in late 2021 - I'll let you guess as to why - but at the end of 2021, Google results on searched terms suddenly showed FAR LOWER results for 2021, throughout the year, even though I'd seen Google report the earlier uptick with my own eyes. Pity I didn't save screenshots, though I've learned from the mistake.

To give you a sense of the magnitude of what I'm talking about, prior to this change, searching for "died suddenly" would return ~140,000 results by third quarter 2021. For every prior year, including 2020 at the height of the pandemic, the search results returned for the calendar year hovered between ~30 - 60k (and no, they didn't just increase linearly year over year, so I don't believe it was simply web decay). I stopped checking after it appeared Google got wise, so I haven't checked it again until today. Google now shows ~84k search hits for 2021, so I'd say the result is still badly skewed.

EDIT: Mistyped the year a couple times.

Expand full comment
Mar 11, 2022Liked by Etana Hecht

I live in scandinavia. I have seen only Comirnaty vials since the start of year 2021 when they first became available. I think it was even mentioned the Comirnaty is the name for Europe and other places might have different names.

Expand full comment

Thanks for this - lots of important info. Appreciate the post!

Expand full comment

Great article! 🙌

Expand full comment

Yes the vaccine is only being distributed under EUA but that doesn’t mean that the FDA hasn’t “approved” it, or in other words, declared it safe and effective. The FDA definitely approved it on August 23, 2021, — for ages 16 and up, and for prevention of COVID-19. Maybe it was approved under fraud but the FDA continuously produces statements that the EUA version is “can be used interchangeably without presenting any safety or effectiveness concerns” so effectiveness as approved is not the issue. The bait-and-switch concerns the scope of approval.

The best explanation for the bait-and-switch: The Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine is only “approved” to be distributed in the U.S. under the name “Comirnaty” for ages 16 and up for the first two doses, but not as boosters, and not for ages under 16. That’s why the vials are distributed only under “EUA” with the “EUA” packaging.

Pfizer puts out fact sheets that say the formulation is “FDA-approved” and then they shift to saying it’s “authorized” for these other uses and people with average reading comprehension (if they read it at all) don’t realize it’s completely unapproved for these uses. For children and as boosters, they can only distribute the vaccine under the “EUA.” And then the CDC goes ahead and recommends the “authorized” versions and the deception is complete.

So why even bother distributing it in the licensed version, and why even pursue full approval for the other uses when most people are easily mislead into thinking it’s approved for all uses anyway?

To summarize: The FDA did declare the currently-distributed version of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine as capable of preventing COVID-19 with the benefits outweighing the risks — but only with respect to usage for ages 16 and up and not as boosters. We can disagree as to whether that is true, but they did make that statement and continue to make that statement about the currently-distributed vaccine. If it were distributed under the name “Comirnaty” it would not be possible to use as boosters or for children; that can only be done with the EUA version.

Expand full comment

They may also have diluted the batches with 'real vaccines' with placebos like saline injections.

Expand full comment

My understanding is that Comirnaty, which is at least *implied* to be identical to the EUA version ("can be used interchangeably"), will be withheld in the United States until it's put on the schedule of required pediatric vaccines, thereby acquiring legal immunity*. This is a plausible explanation for the propaganda campaign to vaccinate children.

Having an oversupply of expiring doses is probably another factor, although what they've done in the past with expiring vaccines is shipped them to places like India and Africa.

* possibly the only kind of immunity associated with these vaccines

Expand full comment

Great article, again, with links supporting the facts. Thank you!!!

Expand full comment
deletedMar 11, 2022Liked by Etana Hecht
Comment deleted
Expand full comment