There was someone from the industry a few months ago who said that the manufacturing capacity per year didn't get anywhere near enough vials to vaxx the number of people that had been the suggestion being that the vaxxes were being produced for several years before 2020.
Mar 11, 2022·edited Mar 11, 2022Liked by Etana Hecht
My son's very health-conscious and trim newlywed millennial teacher (late 20s) was found dead in the school parking lot. Dropped dead. No autopsy. No questions.
In spite of all the gas lighting and even blatant lies, it would be impossible to know what is truth and what is lies without the amazing people behind the research into the data. We’d all be wondering if we’re cookoo conspiracy theorists, and never have that acknowledgment that our gut feelings were indeed correct. In this crazy world, it’s such a blessing to have the information available, the incredibly smart people to dissect, discern and disseminate it, and the tools (internet, Substack community) to have it spread far and wide. It truly gives me hope for humanity- thank you 🙏
That's not true. If you need some grand hope to continue living then that is your standard to continue living and you'll find all kinds of reasons to say there's hope, whether or not there's any evidence to back that up or not. It's not right to push your standard of living onto others. You are you an individual, I know myself and plenty of others who don't have hope, yet we continue to live. We don't set ourselves up for disappointment because we are realistic about the world (talking about myself and some others I know). Whether we ignore the news or not, there are things about life that can be great for many of us (some don't have that privilege), but that doesn't equate to hope. There needs to be an explanation for hope, not some vague explanation like there's some people working hard against this issue and giving us information to disseminate. For every issue that has ever existed there has been at least a small group of people working on the problem and doing a good job. But we haven't really come all that far in regards to most issues. No non-profit has ever closed it's doors because it completed it's mission. I'll continue to live for now, but honestly with the direction we are headed and how zombified humanity has become I definitely don't want to live to as old of an age as I used to be okay with potentially living up to.
Thanks for taking the time to share your viewpoint. I certainly didn’t mean to be pushing any of my views on anyone, just expressing my own feelings. I do agree there are some very dark clouds on the horizon. But one thing I know for certain is that I know nothing for certain. Who knows what’s to happen. I wish you all the best in these crazy times.
Mar 11, 2022·edited Mar 20, 2022Liked by Etana Hecht
Spot on, Elena! One of the few good points of the last few years is that they have shown us who are real enemies and friends are. I never thought I'd be a fan of Naomi Wolf (crazy feminist!) or Russell Brand (demonic nutcase!), but both have shown their true colours. Bravo to them, to you and to the millions who will see this through until justice is done!
"The following vaccines and associated tradenames have been approved by the FDA under BLA License. They are listed separately because while they may represent the same formulations as the EUA authorized and labeled products listed above, the NDCs listed with the new BLA licensed tradenames in the FDA BLA approval or the FDA Structured Product Labels (SPL) are not currently being produced by the manufacturers while EUA product is available."
cominarty specific quote, though the moderna "licensed" spikevax variant is in the same chart
"COMINARTY products are not orderable at this time. NDCs are listed per FDA Structured Product Label (SPL) document for the BLA licensed product. These codes are not included in CDC Vaccine Code Set files at this time. Pfizer has provided the following statement regarding the COMINARTY branded NDCs and labels:
“Pfizer received FDA BLA license on 8/23/2021 for its COVID-19 vaccine for use in individuals 16 and older (COMIRNATY). At that time, the FDA published a BLA package insert that included the approved new COVID-19 vaccine tradename COMIRNATY and listed 2 new NDCs (0069-1000-03, 0069-1000-02) and images of labels with the new tradename.
Pfizer subsequently received approval to amend its FDA BLA License on December 16, 2021 to include its tris-sucrose formulation COVID-19 vaccine for use in individuals 16 and older (COMIRNATY). At that time, the FDA published a BLA package insert that included the approved new COVID-19 vaccine tradename COMIRNATY and listed 3 new NDCs (0069-2025-10, 0069-2025-25, 0069-2025-01) and images of labels with the new tradename.
At present, Pfizer does not plan to produce any product with these new NDCs and labels over the next few months while EUA authorized product is still available and being made available for U.S. distribution. As such, the CDC, AMA, and drug compendia may not publish these new codes until Pfizer has determined when the product will be produced with the BLA labels.”"
yeah, you get enough people together digging through official documents, and you find more interesting things that directly contradict the official disinformation.
I remember looking that one up right after the FDA authorized the version Pfizer ships overseas.
I had to have documentation (that they wouldn't read) to argue with people who said that because the inoculation was now authorized, it justified mandates as it was no longer experimental.
what's funny is that it has been quite some time and they still haven't changed that page on the CDC site.
As part of the BLA approval process, the FDA did make the determination that the primary two-dose series of the Pfizer vaccine is safe and effective for preventing COVID-19 for ages 16 and up (I disagree with this determination, but they did make it). If your definition of “experimental” is “not determined safe and effective by the FDA” then the Pfizer vaccine, whether it is provided under “authorization” (EUA) or “license” under a brand name (approved BLA), is irrelevant for this use.
On the other hand, boosters and doses for children were never so approved (for “authorization” it is only sufficient that the “potential” (unproven) benefits outweigh the risks), so you have a clear-cut case there that we are dealing with “experimental” vaccines. I am aghast that the CDC went ahead and recommended all these unapproved uses anyway. The distinction between approved and authorized apparently means nothing to the CDC.
It is notable that the Federal mandates (Federal workforce, OSHA, CMS worker) never required boosters; they stuck with the original definition of “full vaccination” which could be acquired with an FDA-“approved” (albeit not available as “licensed”) vaccine. But no federal agency seemed to care when local governments and other institutions started requiring boosters and public schools started requiring these shots for children under 16, none of which was approved by the FDA in any sense ever.
With the numbers currently being published (90% of hospitalized patients received full vaccination) it will be easy to prove the FDA is lying in saying the 'vaccines' prevent infection.
The FDA’s Q&As for these products say “It is not known if [the COVID-19 vaccine] protects against asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection.” Since every infection starts out asymptomatic (“incubation period”) they’re saying it hasn’t been proven to prevent infection at all. Whoever is saying they prevent infection, it’s not the FDA.
my take on "experimental" in this case is a product under Emergency Use Authorization that is 1 to 6 years (depending on the specific outcomes and ages being tested) from completing a phase III trial.
not to mention that these are the first ever publicly distributed mRNA products and until the FDA "approved" two of them in spite of horrendous safety profiles and total lack of evidence of ability to either prevent infection or spread, no mRNA product has ever previously been approved for use in humans.
the lack of a completed phase 3 safety trial, especially with no control groups existing past the first 3 months of testing, absolutely means experimental.
the FDA's opinions on "safe and effective" have nothing to do with whether a substance is still in an experimental phase of existence. if anything, the FDA's opinions can generally be used as a guideline for what NOT to believe.
Mar 11, 2022·edited Mar 11, 2022Liked by Etana Hecht
The shenanigans of Cominarty -thx for checking if this is still happening. OMG. It is. I hope pharmacies will be sued for duping people. The stupid sheep think they are getting a "must be safe, it's approved" jab and of course the PHARMICISTS KNOW this is a CDC play on words TRICK. / /Also, thank you for this .. Spike in sudden Goog death searches - wow, that is interesting. Can you imagine, your friend collapes dead and you search Sudden Death. Probably because NoOne in your "trust circle" will admit it's linked to the JABS. Many are searching for the TRUTH is what that says to me. Sadly, if they Googl'd - they Still won't find the Truth.
Yes, many people have known this since the day they were released. Furthermore, they are purported to be identical, only "legally distinct." However, we are forbidden to take the EUA shots to the lab independently to assess the ingredients. Why is that? Why would we trust that assertion when we know they've been lying to us all along?
Mar 15, 2022·edited Mar 15, 2022Liked by Etana Hecht
I think it's worth mentioning that Google search results around "died suddenly" are being manipulated. I can say this with some certainty due to numerous searches I started doing on the term starting in early- to mid-2021. The search term really started to spike in late 2021 - I'll let you guess as to why - but at the end of 2021, Google results on searched terms suddenly showed FAR LOWER results for 2021, throughout the year, even though I'd seen Google report the earlier uptick with my own eyes. Pity I didn't save screenshots, though I've learned from the mistake.
To give you a sense of the magnitude of what I'm talking about, prior to this change, searching for "died suddenly" would return ~140,000 results by third quarter 2021. For every prior year, including 2020 at the height of the pandemic, the search results returned for the calendar year hovered between ~30 - 60k (and no, they didn't just increase linearly year over year, so I don't believe it was simply web decay). I stopped checking after it appeared Google got wise, so I haven't checked it again until today. Google now shows ~84k search hits for 2021, so I'd say the result is still badly skewed.
I live in scandinavia. I have seen only Comirnaty vials since the start of year 2021 when they first became available. I think it was even mentioned the Comirnaty is the name for Europe and other places might have different names.
Comirnaty is conveniently only available OUTSIDE of the US, to enjoy that EUA liability shield. This is why the crazy push to get this injection on the children's vaccine schedule, as that would also shield Pfizer from all patient liability. Cute, right?
Approval, who needs it? The vaccine is not approved for under 16, only “emergency use” authorized for 5 and up. Yeah and Pfizer is going for authorization for 4 and under, maybe. But yeah once the emergency declaration expires, the EUA goes along with it and, it will have to be distributed under license (i.e. as Comirnaty). Pfizer only has a license to market it for ages 16 and up, and even then not as boosters. At this rate it won’t be licensed for children for years, if ever.
I predict Pfizer this vaccine will milk this vaccine for what it’s worth as long as the EUA is valid and then Pfizer will move on to the next big thing.
Yes the vaccine is only being distributed under EUA but that doesn’t mean that the FDA hasn’t “approved” it, or in other words, declared it safe and effective. The FDA definitely approved it on August 23, 2021, — for ages 16 and up, and for prevention of COVID-19. Maybe it was approved under fraud but the FDA continuously produces statements that the EUA version is “can be used interchangeably without presenting any safety or effectiveness concerns” so effectiveness as approved is not the issue. The bait-and-switch concerns the scope of approval.
The best explanation for the bait-and-switch: The Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine is only “approved” to be distributed in the U.S. under the name “Comirnaty” for ages 16 and up for the first two doses, but not as boosters, and not for ages under 16. That’s why the vials are distributed only under “EUA” with the “EUA” packaging.
Pfizer puts out fact sheets that say the formulation is “FDA-approved” and then they shift to saying it’s “authorized” for these other uses and people with average reading comprehension (if they read it at all) don’t realize it’s completely unapproved for these uses. For children and as boosters, they can only distribute the vaccine under the “EUA.” And then the CDC goes ahead and recommends the “authorized” versions and the deception is complete.
So why even bother distributing it in the licensed version, and why even pursue full approval for the other uses when most people are easily mislead into thinking it’s approved for all uses anyway?
To summarize: The FDA did declare the currently-distributed version of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine as capable of preventing COVID-19 with the benefits outweighing the risks — but only with respect to usage for ages 16 and up and not as boosters. We can disagree as to whether that is true, but they did make that statement and continue to make that statement about the currently-distributed vaccine. If it were distributed under the name “Comirnaty” it would not be possible to use as boosters or for children; that can only be done with the EUA version.
My understanding is that Comirnaty, which is at least *implied* to be identical to the EUA version ("can be used interchangeably"), will be withheld in the United States until it's put on the schedule of required pediatric vaccines, thereby acquiring legal immunity*. This is a plausible explanation for the propaganda campaign to vaccinate children.
Having an oversupply of expiring doses is probably another factor, although what they've done in the past with expiring vaccines is shipped them to places like India and Africa.
* possibly the only kind of immunity associated with these vaccines
There was someone from the industry a few months ago who said that the manufacturing capacity per year didn't get anywhere near enough vials to vaxx the number of people that had been the suggestion being that the vaxxes were being produced for several years before 2020.
AND/OR they are lying about the uptake numbers. The number of doses in the latest Pfizer docs was redacted, for example.
That may also have been to deprive us of a denominator, to prevent independent calculations of effectiveness.
Bingo!
My son's very health-conscious and trim newlywed millennial teacher (late 20s) was found dead in the school parking lot. Dropped dead. No autopsy. No questions.
That is horrible, and so traumatizing for the kids. I'm so sorry.
Shocking. Shocking that something so horrible is happening and shocking that there aren’t more people asking questions.
Aren't autopsies for sudden deaths compulsory?
In spite of all the gas lighting and even blatant lies, it would be impossible to know what is truth and what is lies without the amazing people behind the research into the data. We’d all be wondering if we’re cookoo conspiracy theorists, and never have that acknowledgment that our gut feelings were indeed correct. In this crazy world, it’s such a blessing to have the information available, the incredibly smart people to dissect, discern and disseminate it, and the tools (internet, Substack community) to have it spread far and wide. It truly gives me hope for humanity- thank you 🙏
Shouldn't all the research and your lived experience point to there being no hope for humanity? Agreed with your whole comment besides that.
When I feel this way, I look at this quote I have posted in my office. You are welcome to borrow it:
"What can I do? I'm only one person"... said 7 billion people.
Never forget- we far, far out-number the bad guys and we ARE going to clean up this mess and have a much better world!
Love it!!
If there was no hope, there really wouldn’t be any point/desire to continuing living. Or reading Substack.
If we ignore the news, life is still pretty great 😊
That's not true. If you need some grand hope to continue living then that is your standard to continue living and you'll find all kinds of reasons to say there's hope, whether or not there's any evidence to back that up or not. It's not right to push your standard of living onto others. You are you an individual, I know myself and plenty of others who don't have hope, yet we continue to live. We don't set ourselves up for disappointment because we are realistic about the world (talking about myself and some others I know). Whether we ignore the news or not, there are things about life that can be great for many of us (some don't have that privilege), but that doesn't equate to hope. There needs to be an explanation for hope, not some vague explanation like there's some people working hard against this issue and giving us information to disseminate. For every issue that has ever existed there has been at least a small group of people working on the problem and doing a good job. But we haven't really come all that far in regards to most issues. No non-profit has ever closed it's doors because it completed it's mission. I'll continue to live for now, but honestly with the direction we are headed and how zombified humanity has become I definitely don't want to live to as old of an age as I used to be okay with potentially living up to.
Thanks for taking the time to share your viewpoint. I certainly didn’t mean to be pushing any of my views on anyone, just expressing my own feelings. I do agree there are some very dark clouds on the horizon. But one thing I know for certain is that I know nothing for certain. Who knows what’s to happen. I wish you all the best in these crazy times.
Spot on, Elena! One of the few good points of the last few years is that they have shown us who are real enemies and friends are. I never thought I'd be a fan of Naomi Wolf (crazy feminist!) or Russell Brand (demonic nutcase!), but both have shown their true colours. Bravo to them, to you and to the millions who will see this through until justice is done!
Sorry, Etana!!!!!!
I didn't see any mention of the CDC document stating that cominarty isn't available in the US...
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/programs/iis/COVID-19-related-codes.html
in the chart under this text:
"The following vaccines and associated tradenames have been approved by the FDA under BLA License. They are listed separately because while they may represent the same formulations as the EUA authorized and labeled products listed above, the NDCs listed with the new BLA licensed tradenames in the FDA BLA approval or the FDA Structured Product Labels (SPL) are not currently being produced by the manufacturers while EUA product is available."
cominarty specific quote, though the moderna "licensed" spikevax variant is in the same chart
"COMINARTY products are not orderable at this time. NDCs are listed per FDA Structured Product Label (SPL) document for the BLA licensed product. These codes are not included in CDC Vaccine Code Set files at this time. Pfizer has provided the following statement regarding the COMINARTY branded NDCs and labels:
“Pfizer received FDA BLA license on 8/23/2021 for its COVID-19 vaccine for use in individuals 16 and older (COMIRNATY). At that time, the FDA published a BLA package insert that included the approved new COVID-19 vaccine tradename COMIRNATY and listed 2 new NDCs (0069-1000-03, 0069-1000-02) and images of labels with the new tradename.
Pfizer subsequently received approval to amend its FDA BLA License on December 16, 2021 to include its tris-sucrose formulation COVID-19 vaccine for use in individuals 16 and older (COMIRNATY). At that time, the FDA published a BLA package insert that included the approved new COVID-19 vaccine tradename COMIRNATY and listed 3 new NDCs (0069-2025-10, 0069-2025-25, 0069-2025-01) and images of labels with the new tradename.
At present, Pfizer does not plan to produce any product with these new NDCs and labels over the next few months while EUA authorized product is still available and being made available for U.S. distribution. As such, the CDC, AMA, and drug compendia may not publish these new codes until Pfizer has determined when the product will be produced with the BLA labels.”"
This is why I love Substack.
yeah, you get enough people together digging through official documents, and you find more interesting things that directly contradict the official disinformation.
I remember looking that one up right after the FDA authorized the version Pfizer ships overseas.
I had to have documentation (that they wouldn't read) to argue with people who said that because the inoculation was now authorized, it justified mandates as it was no longer experimental.
what's funny is that it has been quite some time and they still haven't changed that page on the CDC site.
As part of the BLA approval process, the FDA did make the determination that the primary two-dose series of the Pfizer vaccine is safe and effective for preventing COVID-19 for ages 16 and up (I disagree with this determination, but they did make it). If your definition of “experimental” is “not determined safe and effective by the FDA” then the Pfizer vaccine, whether it is provided under “authorization” (EUA) or “license” under a brand name (approved BLA), is irrelevant for this use.
On the other hand, boosters and doses for children were never so approved (for “authorization” it is only sufficient that the “potential” (unproven) benefits outweigh the risks), so you have a clear-cut case there that we are dealing with “experimental” vaccines. I am aghast that the CDC went ahead and recommended all these unapproved uses anyway. The distinction between approved and authorized apparently means nothing to the CDC.
It is notable that the Federal mandates (Federal workforce, OSHA, CMS worker) never required boosters; they stuck with the original definition of “full vaccination” which could be acquired with an FDA-“approved” (albeit not available as “licensed”) vaccine. But no federal agency seemed to care when local governments and other institutions started requiring boosters and public schools started requiring these shots for children under 16, none of which was approved by the FDA in any sense ever.
With the numbers currently being published (90% of hospitalized patients received full vaccination) it will be easy to prove the FDA is lying in saying the 'vaccines' prevent infection.
The FDA’s Q&As for these products say “It is not known if [the COVID-19 vaccine] protects against asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection.” Since every infection starts out asymptomatic (“incubation period”) they’re saying it hasn’t been proven to prevent infection at all. Whoever is saying they prevent infection, it’s not the FDA.
https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/qa-comirnaty-covid-19-vaccine-mrna
https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/qa-spikevax-covid-19-vaccine-mrna
https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid-19/janssen-covid-19-vaccine-frequently-asked-questions
my take on "experimental" in this case is a product under Emergency Use Authorization that is 1 to 6 years (depending on the specific outcomes and ages being tested) from completing a phase III trial.
not to mention that these are the first ever publicly distributed mRNA products and until the FDA "approved" two of them in spite of horrendous safety profiles and total lack of evidence of ability to either prevent infection or spread, no mRNA product has ever previously been approved for use in humans.
the lack of a completed phase 3 safety trial, especially with no control groups existing past the first 3 months of testing, absolutely means experimental.
the FDA's opinions on "safe and effective" have nothing to do with whether a substance is still in an experimental phase of existence. if anything, the FDA's opinions can generally be used as a guideline for what NOT to believe.
Thanks, but I can’t even stand to read all the government bs you posted- to me, that’s a massive red flag saying: don’t get near this product!
The shenanigans of Cominarty -thx for checking if this is still happening. OMG. It is. I hope pharmacies will be sued for duping people. The stupid sheep think they are getting a "must be safe, it's approved" jab and of course the PHARMICISTS KNOW this is a CDC play on words TRICK. / /Also, thank you for this .. Spike in sudden Goog death searches - wow, that is interesting. Can you imagine, your friend collapes dead and you search Sudden Death. Probably because NoOne in your "trust circle" will admit it's linked to the JABS. Many are searching for the TRUTH is what that says to me. Sadly, if they Googl'd - they Still won't find the Truth.
Yes, many people have known this since the day they were released. Furthermore, they are purported to be identical, only "legally distinct." However, we are forbidden to take the EUA shots to the lab independently to assess the ingredients. Why is that? Why would we trust that assertion when we know they've been lying to us all along?
I think it's worth mentioning that Google search results around "died suddenly" are being manipulated. I can say this with some certainty due to numerous searches I started doing on the term starting in early- to mid-2021. The search term really started to spike in late 2021 - I'll let you guess as to why - but at the end of 2021, Google results on searched terms suddenly showed FAR LOWER results for 2021, throughout the year, even though I'd seen Google report the earlier uptick with my own eyes. Pity I didn't save screenshots, though I've learned from the mistake.
To give you a sense of the magnitude of what I'm talking about, prior to this change, searching for "died suddenly" would return ~140,000 results by third quarter 2021. For every prior year, including 2020 at the height of the pandemic, the search results returned for the calendar year hovered between ~30 - 60k (and no, they didn't just increase linearly year over year, so I don't believe it was simply web decay). I stopped checking after it appeared Google got wise, so I haven't checked it again until today. Google now shows ~84k search hits for 2021, so I'd say the result is still badly skewed.
EDIT: Mistyped the year a couple times.
Wow, thanks for this info! Can't say I'm surprised.
I live in scandinavia. I have seen only Comirnaty vials since the start of year 2021 when they first became available. I think it was even mentioned the Comirnaty is the name for Europe and other places might have different names.
Comirnaty is conveniently only available OUTSIDE of the US, to enjoy that EUA liability shield. This is why the crazy push to get this injection on the children's vaccine schedule, as that would also shield Pfizer from all patient liability. Cute, right?
Look, the CDC already puts it at the top of the children’s schedule page: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/hcp/imz/child-adolescent.html
Approval, who needs it? The vaccine is not approved for under 16, only “emergency use” authorized for 5 and up. Yeah and Pfizer is going for authorization for 4 and under, maybe. But yeah once the emergency declaration expires, the EUA goes along with it and, it will have to be distributed under license (i.e. as Comirnaty). Pfizer only has a license to market it for ages 16 and up, and even then not as boosters. At this rate it won’t be licensed for children for years, if ever.
I predict Pfizer this vaccine will milk this vaccine for what it’s worth as long as the EUA is valid and then Pfizer will move on to the next big thing.
Thanks for this - lots of important info. Appreciate the post!
Great article! 🙌
Thank you!
Yes the vaccine is only being distributed under EUA but that doesn’t mean that the FDA hasn’t “approved” it, or in other words, declared it safe and effective. The FDA definitely approved it on August 23, 2021, — for ages 16 and up, and for prevention of COVID-19. Maybe it was approved under fraud but the FDA continuously produces statements that the EUA version is “can be used interchangeably without presenting any safety or effectiveness concerns” so effectiveness as approved is not the issue. The bait-and-switch concerns the scope of approval.
The best explanation for the bait-and-switch: The Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine is only “approved” to be distributed in the U.S. under the name “Comirnaty” for ages 16 and up for the first two doses, but not as boosters, and not for ages under 16. That’s why the vials are distributed only under “EUA” with the “EUA” packaging.
Pfizer puts out fact sheets that say the formulation is “FDA-approved” and then they shift to saying it’s “authorized” for these other uses and people with average reading comprehension (if they read it at all) don’t realize it’s completely unapproved for these uses. For children and as boosters, they can only distribute the vaccine under the “EUA.” And then the CDC goes ahead and recommends the “authorized” versions and the deception is complete.
So why even bother distributing it in the licensed version, and why even pursue full approval for the other uses when most people are easily mislead into thinking it’s approved for all uses anyway?
To summarize: The FDA did declare the currently-distributed version of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine as capable of preventing COVID-19 with the benefits outweighing the risks — but only with respect to usage for ages 16 and up and not as boosters. We can disagree as to whether that is true, but they did make that statement and continue to make that statement about the currently-distributed vaccine. If it were distributed under the name “Comirnaty” it would not be possible to use as boosters or for children; that can only be done with the EUA version.
They may also have diluted the batches with 'real vaccines' with placebos like saline injections.
My understanding is that Comirnaty, which is at least *implied* to be identical to the EUA version ("can be used interchangeably"), will be withheld in the United States until it's put on the schedule of required pediatric vaccines, thereby acquiring legal immunity*. This is a plausible explanation for the propaganda campaign to vaccinate children.
Having an oversupply of expiring doses is probably another factor, although what they've done in the past with expiring vaccines is shipped them to places like India and Africa.
* possibly the only kind of immunity associated with these vaccines
Great article, again, with links supporting the facts. Thank you!!!
Thanks!