I need to work on my phone skills, so this might be a good challenge. These people need to be held accountable. So I think a reasonable question to ask them is "how do you sleep at night?" And for me the pressing questions are not necessarily about efficacy but the question is "why the push?" "on what grounds did they consider the virus so deadly it required flouting years of data acquisition in order to put it on the market?" How many of the deaths were due to bad protocols, iatrogenic means, and also mis labelling of death certificates in order to satisfy certain incentives?
Could the healthcare system also have hyperbolized this whole fiasco because it was failing and needed a crisis in order to garner funding?
Sep 5, 2023·edited Sep 5, 2023Liked by Etana Hecht
Questions : (these may be moot because I'm not sure they even DID any clinical trials!) One booster was tested on 8 MICE, then released on the public, including CHILDREN.
*Is this new booster FDA approved?
*Is there more than one manufacturer of these new boosters?
*Did they each perform human clinical trials?
*How long did this human clinical trial last?
*How many people were in this clinical trial and how long were they monitored?
*How is any data about severe adverse reactions collected and who has access to it?
*Did the clinical trials include people of all ages and health conditions, especially the immuno-compromised?
*Were immuno-compromised people included in these trials?
*Is this booster recommended for pregnant women?
*Were pregnant women included in the clinical trials?
*What is the efficacy of this booster to stop transmission or stop one from contracting this "scariant", I mean, variant.
I noticed she mentioned CDC data, I wonder what her comment would be on the VAERS death data, which remained fairly stable at an average of 157 reported deaths per year over the first 30 years of its existence, until 2021 when it jumped for some reason to 22,284 reported deaths, a jaw-dropping 141x the baseline. According to the CDC disclaimer on VAERS data, "The number of reports alone cannot be interpreted or used to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, frequency, or rates of problems associated with vaccines.", so apparently they don't differentiate between a year with 157 reported deaths and one with 22,284 reported deaths. They do however note that "VAERS is designed to rapidly detect unusual or unexpected patterns of adverse events, also known as “safety signals.”". So I'd ask her 1) was this gigantic spike identified as a safety signal? 2) If not, why not? 3) If so, when, and what followup research was performed and what were the results? If she tries to punt and say that all that is the purview of the CDC and not the FDA, I'd ask if the FDA was aware of this data point when they approved the vaccine - if not, then perhaps she could get on the phone and call some people and let em know what's up, and if so, did they bother to follow up on this little detail before approving it. Maybe you could incorporate this line of questioning if you make some more calls.
I have challenged myself to attempt to make this call myself, I don't have a lot faith in my ability to refrain from going from "good morning" to "what the fuck is wrong with you people" over the space of a few seconds, but I agree strongly with the notion that we all need to be a part of whatever solution solves what's happening, assuming one exists. If I manage to pull it off without being a giant asshole and the results are interesting I will post it.
Wow! That's quite the return! I LIKE IT!
Welcome back, and may you have continued good health!
A bloody good idea. Any actions are better than just talk.
That audio clip is an awesome example of how to call out the FDA, without denigrating the poor rep at the other end who may become a future ally.
KOL HAKAVOD Etana !
I need to work on my phone skills, so this might be a good challenge. These people need to be held accountable. So I think a reasonable question to ask them is "how do you sleep at night?" And for me the pressing questions are not necessarily about efficacy but the question is "why the push?" "on what grounds did they consider the virus so deadly it required flouting years of data acquisition in order to put it on the market?" How many of the deaths were due to bad protocols, iatrogenic means, and also mis labelling of death certificates in order to satisfy certain incentives?
Could the healthcare system also have hyperbolized this whole fiasco because it was failing and needed a crisis in order to garner funding?
Welcome back. Glad Henry helped you. Excellent strategy. I will forward and do it.
Questions : (these may be moot because I'm not sure they even DID any clinical trials!) One booster was tested on 8 MICE, then released on the public, including CHILDREN.
*Is this new booster FDA approved?
*Is there more than one manufacturer of these new boosters?
*Did they each perform human clinical trials?
*How long did this human clinical trial last?
*How many people were in this clinical trial and how long were they monitored?
*How is any data about severe adverse reactions collected and who has access to it?
*Did the clinical trials include people of all ages and health conditions, especially the immuno-compromised?
*Were immuno-compromised people included in these trials?
*Is this booster recommended for pregnant women?
*Were pregnant women included in the clinical trials?
*What is the efficacy of this booster to stop transmission or stop one from contracting this "scariant", I mean, variant.
Feel free to add to this list.
Brilliant idea.
Welcome back, Etana! Glad you're here again. Hope your health issues are completely resolved real soon.
Good to have you back. It has been quite a few years.
Etana - I confronted my state AG. Take a listen. https://josephsansone.substack.com/p/shocking-ohio-attorney-general-claims
I thought all of the vaccine package inserts were blank? So which inserts is she referring too exactly??
Welcome back!! You’ve been missed!
Agree with Justin-you are BACK! Woooo!
I noticed she mentioned CDC data, I wonder what her comment would be on the VAERS death data, which remained fairly stable at an average of 157 reported deaths per year over the first 30 years of its existence, until 2021 when it jumped for some reason to 22,284 reported deaths, a jaw-dropping 141x the baseline. According to the CDC disclaimer on VAERS data, "The number of reports alone cannot be interpreted or used to reach conclusions about the existence, severity, frequency, or rates of problems associated with vaccines.", so apparently they don't differentiate between a year with 157 reported deaths and one with 22,284 reported deaths. They do however note that "VAERS is designed to rapidly detect unusual or unexpected patterns of adverse events, also known as “safety signals.”". So I'd ask her 1) was this gigantic spike identified as a safety signal? 2) If not, why not? 3) If so, when, and what followup research was performed and what were the results? If she tries to punt and say that all that is the purview of the CDC and not the FDA, I'd ask if the FDA was aware of this data point when they approved the vaccine - if not, then perhaps she could get on the phone and call some people and let em know what's up, and if so, did they bother to follow up on this little detail before approving it. Maybe you could incorporate this line of questioning if you make some more calls.
I have challenged myself to attempt to make this call myself, I don't have a lot faith in my ability to refrain from going from "good morning" to "what the fuck is wrong with you people" over the space of a few seconds, but I agree strongly with the notion that we all need to be a part of whatever solution solves what's happening, assuming one exists. If I manage to pull it off without being a giant asshole and the results are interesting I will post it.