I believe Walensky is nothing more than an order-following minion and though the face of the CDC, was purposely never intended to be anything more than that. Pharma-government collluding shill. I would not be surprised if every proclamation, announcement, decision by her was made for her. Because of that, she will be compensated and protected and likely go away quietly.
So grateful for these freedom pioneers (Wolf, Malone, Dowd, and thousands of others) who not only explain it to the rest of us, but are actually building for the future. Not just informing, but working toward the solutions.
Totally agree, re: Walensky. She doesn't seem that bright, and when she speaks it's as though she's reading a script. You don't get the idea that you're hearing original thought from her.
Even if all of Dowd's statistics are eventually accepted by the entire American voting public and all politicians, nothing will change.
No fraud charges can stick to Pfizer or Moderna because development of the jabs was done during an emergency. As such the relevant law did not require real safety testing. And the Health and Human Services agency itself vouched for their efficacy. It doesn't matter what Moderna, Pfizer, the CDC or the FDA said about safety. They were never required to verify safety.
Emergency Use Authorization relaxes the usual requirements. The government will cloak itself in emergency powers laws which Congress passed years ago. We won't see massive fraud charges or successful shareholder lawsuits against Pfizer.
The situation is FUBAR. The best we can maybe hope for is a change of the federal pandemic emergency law so that we can avoid a repeat of jabs like this in the future. And even that is unlikely. The current law is just too lucrative for Pfizer.
I believe that's true. But who was defrauded? The government? The FDA never required real safety studies. The government won't sue them for fraud. The government is in on it.
Are we the people going to sue the government? For what? The EUA and the forms one had to sign were so full of disclaimers -- everyone who got the jab signed their rights away!
On what grounds of fraud will people sue the government for these jabs? Some clever team of lawyers will have to work pretty hard to figure that one out, I guess.
I predict that Pfizer will be forced to provide more documentation and satisfy additional discovery requests, but, sadly, still win the case.
FWIW, I still imagine that a successful lawsuit against the CDC and FDA is more likely than one against Pfizer/Moderna. But what do I know? I just read the headlines like anyone else.
Although they had NO RIGHT TO MANDATE THESE JABS! And everyone involved in mandating jabs for school, work or anything else should be held libel in the Nuremberg Trials to commence soon!
Definitely agree. They had no right. And the Supreme Court agreed that they could not use OSHA to force these jabs on millions and millions of US workers.
And yet, one interesting note: Supreme Court *did* allow the federal government to force healthcare workers to get these jabs, because of something about federal funding for healthcare. Or something. And so, I have to wonder, if the overall conspiracy here is to kill hundreds of millions of people, were they trying to accomplish that by first killing all of the healthcare workers? Is this a crazy theory? OTOH, what contradicts that idea is: wouldn't a mass murdering conspirator who hoped at all for a decent life after the depopulation event want a robust healthcare sector to exist in the future? IDK.
I surely do agree that the dismantling of all just previously stated, is the only solution. I love the concept of teaching the generation about mores and values. I do know many of them will be relieved to finally hear the truth. Then start being able to start working on building their own lives. So encouraging, thank you.
Nobody will be spared [including the psychotic dolts who gain-of-functioned their out-of-control monster] and the goal is depopulation...rich/poor, young/old, athlete/unhealthy, hermit/celebrity, religious/atheist, doctor/patient, friend/foe, genius/imbecile, pets/wildlife...
The creeping evil only sees a cascade of death as a scorched earth end-game.
Never Let these "Intellectual Giants" of the Dark Ages off the Hook. They showed their true colors and would have burned Galileo at the stake if he hadn't recanted his Round Earth theory on pain of being CXL'd.
Does anyone know if Wolf still ascribes to the cult of feminism? If so, I'm really not interested in anything she's spearheading. Also, while we're broaching the topic of the CDC, I caught another lie from them if anyone's interested (and especially if anyone knows a good lawyer or existing lawsuit to hand it off to): https://veryofficialnews.substack.com/p/yes-the-cdc-did-perpetuate-an-overt
If Jack the Ripper is offering you a hand without which you would fall off a cliff to your death, would you take it? I cringe at the statement that you refuse to listen to someone now because you once disagreed with what she said. She has done tremendous work around these poisonous injections and digs deep into the politics and money behind it. Everything is backed by data and facts. I suggest you read what she has written and see if you can set aside the issue of feminism for the bigger picture.
Honestly, I do not know Wolf's stance on feminism or the feminist cult of perennial self-victimization. Maybe I should. But what I have seen her do in the past two years is unparalleled. Whatever her feminism stance, whatever she wrote, it would have to be damn heretical for me to discard all of her contributions to the issues we are talking about now.
Your response appears totally oblivious to my comment. Firstly, I asked a question about whether she still stood by the cult of feminism. This is the opposite of holding what she once said against her; I'm asking whether or not she still does.
As for the data she has uncovered, I agree, data is data and it is useful. I didn't say I'd reject her data; that would be foolish. However, if she means to spearhead a new institution, and she still ascribes to the feminist cult of perennial self-victimization and drumming up an endless battle between the sexes, I have no interest in it.
Yeah, that makes no sense. I made you a lasagna you didn’t like last year and I’m now running a pet store. So you’re anticipating I’ll be selling that meal at the store so you’re not going to go. I’m pretty sure the “feminist cult of perennial self-victimization” relates in no way to pharmaceutical corruption, vaccine injury, globalization or tyranny but you do you.
Just so I know we're being consistent, if Patrisse Cullors of Black Lives Matter was trying to start a center "to rebuild American civil society, from medicine to politics to journalism, in ways free of corruption, and we need to teach America’s best ideals to the next generation, lest they be lost", would you be on board with her leadership there? I suspect many in Black Lives Matter (leadership included) are opposed to vaccine mandates. The real question are what "America's best ideals" are. It is my opinion that they aren't represented by those who seek to remake America into a grievance hierarchy, and so if Wolf is still one of those, my vote is hard pass.
I hear you but it’s apples and oranges to me. Feminism and tyranny aren’t opposites and do you really think Wolf is Cullers’ equivalent? I believe her to be sincere as opposed to being controlled opposition, which would be the case in your example. But aside from all of that, if BLM took the position that vaccines and mandates were bad, I’d still celebrate that.
As would I. I still wouldn't get behind them running anything. And no, she wouldn't have to be controlled opposition to still be a feminist cultist. She can be sincere in her opposition to mandates and oligarchical control and still be a feminist. If that were the case, she'd likely just classify the elites as an extension of "the patriarchy". It's really not hard to imagine.
Naomi herself has had a bit of an awakening around all this-much like we all have. ( I assume I am not speaking only for myself when I say that people I used to hold in high regard as intellectuals and friends, I now see in a much less complementary light given their capitulation to the Political Science, and their vilification of those who chose not to take the C19 injections) I was suspicious of her myself early on, but then read a piece of hers last fall where she describes also feeling duped and betrayed by the many prominent women who once supported and echoed her, but who, on a dime, switched the dial on their Virtue Signalers from the 'feminism' frequency to "Covidism", succumbing, embracing and then broadcasting the narrative in tis entirety despite the risks to their own liberty, fertility and possibly even their lives. Give her a chance- she has learned the lesson we always knew she needed to.
Yes Camilla. Most of us are on a similar journey but on different timetables. I read her substack snd she has been on a progression to the truth. I wish myself I had started a journal from the beginning of this to document what I was thinking at the time and the impact of the revelations as they came. The final putting together of it really blew up my world last late summer. But at least we are on the journey. 👍🏻
There hasn't been evidence over the last couple of years to support that she's still holding that stance, at least that I have found. And to be honest.....it seems like once discernment starts to really come online surrounding one particular topic or area, others also get highlighted. You begin to see the holes in everything that you once believed in. If you are dedicated to having an open mind, you will allow yourself to examine all your sacred First Principals.....and to challenge them. This happened to me, and to many others that I know; it was like dominos falling. Once you see the big picture; the control grid behind the scenes being operated by a few parasites, you recognize the web of lies for exactly what they are. The toxic masculine and toxic feminine archetypes are the distorted shadows of the Divine masculine and Divine feminine, and have been deliberately twisted and distorted by the same cabal that is behind the rest of the inversions that we've lived our lives believing to be "normal". All that crap is coming out into the light...so it can be dismantled.
Well said. My world of belief fell apart last fall and I truly felt like Jonah spit from the whale onto a foreign shore. I had no idea where to go or what to believe anymore. But it was a challenge to me as well. I went to God. He answered. This is the nutshell version of what I went through. The same awakening that many of us did here. I also discovered Substack. There is a plan being worked out and one way more powerful than the obvious demons trying to run this current sh!tshow. Everyday more eyes are opened. I have hope.
Mike. I used to hate Steve Bannon but guess what? I believe now he is doing good work. I have let my mind and cognitive function open wide to decide for myself and use facts instead of preconceived notions. My mind changed. Not yours? Cheers.
Hi Janet, hopefully you're being hyperbolic in saying you hated Bannon, although given the political divide over the last half decade or so, you may be telling the blunt truth, in which case I appreciate your truthfulness and that you became open to a new perspective. For my part, I've never hated Naomi Wolf, and I doubt I would even if I knew more about her than the minutia of cursory information I have now. I try (with degrees of fallibility) not to be hateful, even in cases where others are evidentially hateful toward me. I also have been impressed with the work that Naomi has done over the last couple of years. None of this is at odds with anything I've said thus far in this thread.
I believe Walensky is nothing more than an order-following minion and though the face of the CDC, was purposely never intended to be anything more than that. Pharma-government collluding shill. I would not be surprised if every proclamation, announcement, decision by her was made for her. Because of that, she will be compensated and protected and likely go away quietly.
So grateful for these freedom pioneers (Wolf, Malone, Dowd, and thousands of others) who not only explain it to the rest of us, but are actually building for the future. Not just informing, but working toward the solutions.
Great post-thank you!
Totally agree, re: Walensky. She doesn't seem that bright, and when she speaks it's as though she's reading a script. You don't get the idea that you're hearing original thought from her.
Kinda like the VP and her crappy writer(s).
With a big assist from affirmative action at work here.
Equity.
Yes. <gag>
It’s happening! The awake are mobilizing! To quote Steve Bannon, “Run through the tape!”
The whole thing feels surreal
…hard times make strong men…
Well, the next generation will have no choice but to create strong men.
"The school of hard knocks" the elders used to call it. We haven't bottomed yet.
We first have to deal with the current generation that can't even "fight" the anxiety they feel from being called by the "wrong" pronoun!
Even if all of Dowd's statistics are eventually accepted by the entire American voting public and all politicians, nothing will change.
No fraud charges can stick to Pfizer or Moderna because development of the jabs was done during an emergency. As such the relevant law did not require real safety testing. And the Health and Human Services agency itself vouched for their efficacy. It doesn't matter what Moderna, Pfizer, the CDC or the FDA said about safety. They were never required to verify safety.
Emergency Use Authorization relaxes the usual requirements. The government will cloak itself in emergency powers laws which Congress passed years ago. We won't see massive fraud charges or successful shareholder lawsuits against Pfizer.
The situation is FUBAR. The best we can maybe hope for is a change of the federal pandemic emergency law so that we can avoid a repeat of jabs like this in the future. And even that is unlikely. The current law is just too lucrative for Pfizer.
Fraud is not protected.
I believe that's true. But who was defrauded? The government? The FDA never required real safety studies. The government won't sue them for fraud. The government is in on it.
Are we the people going to sue the government? For what? The EUA and the forms one had to sign were so full of disclaimers -- everyone who got the jab signed their rights away!
On what grounds of fraud will people sue the government for these jabs? Some clever team of lawyers will have to work pretty hard to figure that one out, I guess.
Brook Jackson is suing Pfizer, Ventavia (outsourced clinical trial company) and ICAN on behalf of the American people for fraud.
More info: https://etana.substack.com/p/brook-on-behalf-of-the-people
I predict that Pfizer will be forced to provide more documentation and satisfy additional discovery requests, but, sadly, still win the case.
FWIW, I still imagine that a successful lawsuit against the CDC and FDA is more likely than one against Pfizer/Moderna. But what do I know? I just read the headlines like anyone else.
Although they had NO RIGHT TO MANDATE THESE JABS! And everyone involved in mandating jabs for school, work or anything else should be held libel in the Nuremberg Trials to commence soon!
They had no right, but they had all the power.
Still do...
Definitely agree. They had no right. And the Supreme Court agreed that they could not use OSHA to force these jabs on millions and millions of US workers.
And yet, one interesting note: Supreme Court *did* allow the federal government to force healthcare workers to get these jabs, because of something about federal funding for healthcare. Or something. And so, I have to wonder, if the overall conspiracy here is to kill hundreds of millions of people, were they trying to accomplish that by first killing all of the healthcare workers? Is this a crazy theory? OTOH, what contradicts that idea is: wouldn't a mass murdering conspirator who hoped at all for a decent life after the depopulation event want a robust healthcare sector to exist in the future? IDK.
Everyone with a brain knows that 9/11 was a false flag, but the result, the Orwellian-named "Patriot" Act is still in effect...
Great explanation! Dead on! 👍👍👍
I surely do agree that the dismantling of all just previously stated, is the only solution. I love the concept of teaching the generation about mores and values. I do know many of them will be relieved to finally hear the truth. Then start being able to start working on building their own lives. So encouraging, thank you.
I applaud Naomi's effort! Make them a force to be reckoned with.
This is so sad.
Nobody will be spared [including the psychotic dolts who gain-of-functioned their out-of-control monster] and the goal is depopulation...rich/poor, young/old, athlete/unhealthy, hermit/celebrity, religious/atheist, doctor/patient, friend/foe, genius/imbecile, pets/wildlife...
The creeping evil only sees a cascade of death as a scorched earth end-game.
There is a pattern though. So far mostly the compliant ones were the target.
Except the Pure bloods!
There is a vaccine injury in British royal family. https://www.google.com/amp/s/pagesix.com/2021/05/15/princess-michael-of-kent-battling-blood-clots-after-covid-vaccine/amp/
Never Let these "Intellectual Giants" of the Dark Ages off the Hook. They showed their true colors and would have burned Galileo at the stake if he hadn't recanted his Round Earth theory on pain of being CXL'd.
https://youtu.be/e1x2syNrl38?t=15
The CDC has been corrupt since it's inception though what is happening now is on an unprecendted scale. For a historical view of the CDC go here:
Kickbacks, Corruption & Scandal: The History of the CDC
https://off-guardian.org/2022/04/29/kickbacks-corruption-scandal-the-history-of-the-cdc/
Absolutely disgusting what was done
Biopsies were not allowed for a reason.
Does anyone know if Wolf still ascribes to the cult of feminism? If so, I'm really not interested in anything she's spearheading. Also, while we're broaching the topic of the CDC, I caught another lie from them if anyone's interested (and especially if anyone knows a good lawyer or existing lawsuit to hand it off to): https://veryofficialnews.substack.com/p/yes-the-cdc-did-perpetuate-an-overt
If Jack the Ripper is offering you a hand without which you would fall off a cliff to your death, would you take it? I cringe at the statement that you refuse to listen to someone now because you once disagreed with what she said. She has done tremendous work around these poisonous injections and digs deep into the politics and money behind it. Everything is backed by data and facts. I suggest you read what she has written and see if you can set aside the issue of feminism for the bigger picture.
Save your breath, in the parlance of the day, "He's a male chauvinist pig."
Honestly, I do not know Wolf's stance on feminism or the feminist cult of perennial self-victimization. Maybe I should. But what I have seen her do in the past two years is unparalleled. Whatever her feminism stance, whatever she wrote, it would have to be damn heretical for me to discard all of her contributions to the issues we are talking about now.
I'm on your side. You don't need to explain to me.
I think he may have been responding to me, the chauvinist pig.
She wrote The Beauty Myth which is pretty good
I'm not concerned with her past views, but present. If you find out anything apropos and remember this thread, feel free to let me know.
Got me.
Your response appears totally oblivious to my comment. Firstly, I asked a question about whether she still stood by the cult of feminism. This is the opposite of holding what she once said against her; I'm asking whether or not she still does.
As for the data she has uncovered, I agree, data is data and it is useful. I didn't say I'd reject her data; that would be foolish. However, if she means to spearhead a new institution, and she still ascribes to the feminist cult of perennial self-victimization and drumming up an endless battle between the sexes, I have no interest in it.
You do you.
Yeah, that makes no sense. I made you a lasagna you didn’t like last year and I’m now running a pet store. So you’re anticipating I’ll be selling that meal at the store so you’re not going to go. I’m pretty sure the “feminist cult of perennial self-victimization” relates in no way to pharmaceutical corruption, vaccine injury, globalization or tyranny but you do you.
Just so I know we're being consistent, if Patrisse Cullors of Black Lives Matter was trying to start a center "to rebuild American civil society, from medicine to politics to journalism, in ways free of corruption, and we need to teach America’s best ideals to the next generation, lest they be lost", would you be on board with her leadership there? I suspect many in Black Lives Matter (leadership included) are opposed to vaccine mandates. The real question are what "America's best ideals" are. It is my opinion that they aren't represented by those who seek to remake America into a grievance hierarchy, and so if Wolf is still one of those, my vote is hard pass.
I hear you but it’s apples and oranges to me. Feminism and tyranny aren’t opposites and do you really think Wolf is Cullers’ equivalent? I believe her to be sincere as opposed to being controlled opposition, which would be the case in your example. But aside from all of that, if BLM took the position that vaccines and mandates were bad, I’d still celebrate that.
As would I. I still wouldn't get behind them running anything. And no, she wouldn't have to be controlled opposition to still be a feminist cultist. She can be sincere in her opposition to mandates and oligarchical control and still be a feminist. If that were the case, she'd likely just classify the elites as an extension of "the patriarchy". It's really not hard to imagine.
Naomi herself has had a bit of an awakening around all this-much like we all have. ( I assume I am not speaking only for myself when I say that people I used to hold in high regard as intellectuals and friends, I now see in a much less complementary light given their capitulation to the Political Science, and their vilification of those who chose not to take the C19 injections) I was suspicious of her myself early on, but then read a piece of hers last fall where she describes also feeling duped and betrayed by the many prominent women who once supported and echoed her, but who, on a dime, switched the dial on their Virtue Signalers from the 'feminism' frequency to "Covidism", succumbing, embracing and then broadcasting the narrative in tis entirety despite the risks to their own liberty, fertility and possibly even their lives. Give her a chance- she has learned the lesson we always knew she needed to.
Yes Camilla. Most of us are on a similar journey but on different timetables. I read her substack snd she has been on a progression to the truth. I wish myself I had started a journal from the beginning of this to document what I was thinking at the time and the impact of the revelations as they came. The final putting together of it really blew up my world last late summer. But at least we are on the journey. 👍🏻
There hasn't been evidence over the last couple of years to support that she's still holding that stance, at least that I have found. And to be honest.....it seems like once discernment starts to really come online surrounding one particular topic or area, others also get highlighted. You begin to see the holes in everything that you once believed in. If you are dedicated to having an open mind, you will allow yourself to examine all your sacred First Principals.....and to challenge them. This happened to me, and to many others that I know; it was like dominos falling. Once you see the big picture; the control grid behind the scenes being operated by a few parasites, you recognize the web of lies for exactly what they are. The toxic masculine and toxic feminine archetypes are the distorted shadows of the Divine masculine and Divine feminine, and have been deliberately twisted and distorted by the same cabal that is behind the rest of the inversions that we've lived our lives believing to be "normal". All that crap is coming out into the light...so it can be dismantled.
Well said. My world of belief fell apart last fall and I truly felt like Jonah spit from the whale onto a foreign shore. I had no idea where to go or what to believe anymore. But it was a challenge to me as well. I went to God. He answered. This is the nutshell version of what I went through. The same awakening that many of us did here. I also discovered Substack. There is a plan being worked out and one way more powerful than the obvious demons trying to run this current sh!tshow. Everyday more eyes are opened. I have hope.
Very well said!
Mike. I used to hate Steve Bannon but guess what? I believe now he is doing good work. I have let my mind and cognitive function open wide to decide for myself and use facts instead of preconceived notions. My mind changed. Not yours? Cheers.
Hi Janet, hopefully you're being hyperbolic in saying you hated Bannon, although given the political divide over the last half decade or so, you may be telling the blunt truth, in which case I appreciate your truthfulness and that you became open to a new perspective. For my part, I've never hated Naomi Wolf, and I doubt I would even if I knew more about her than the minutia of cursory information I have now. I try (with degrees of fallibility) not to be hateful, even in cases where others are evidentially hateful toward me. I also have been impressed with the work that Naomi has done over the last couple of years. None of this is at odds with anything I've said thus far in this thread.
Happy Sunday, and God bless (and I mean that)
Silence, male