So they cheated and lied, then cheated and lied about cheating and lying. And now somehow, though numerous countries are ending the vax, at least in children, tightening the reins on the entire thing, WE in the USA are doubling down, still saying get it, get it, get it and give it to your kids. HOW can this go on? HOW can they sleep at night? HOW have so
You may be onto something. A good friend, a nurse, when confronted (diplomatically) w/ data on ALL-CAUSE mortality & infertility actually said, “If we’d all just stop trying to prove ourselves
right, we could actually cure people.” Whaaat…? I used to
Please cross refer with Katherine Watt of Baileick news; the documents Pfizer provided in the Brook Jackson whistleblower case show that the trials were purposely a facade; under the ‘other transaction authority’ with the DOD, those contracts super-ceded other contracts; there was (pseudo) legally no need to prove ‘safe & effective’ … as they are ‘counter-measures’ rather than pharmaceutical products. CDC are actually out of the loop and are ‘role-playing’ in terms of regulation.
I agree with Katherines meticulous assessment but I can't reconcIle This context on a multi country scenario. This is global. Every country had its individual contract with its individual regulatory body and Pfizer et al. Yes, it's possible all other countries followed the FDA and CDC resolutions (so these individual bodies can be held accountable, per individual countries laws, for malfeasance and negligence), but your talking about EVERY countries military being involved as well.
However, I think your on to something because Australia's defence force was conscripted to "help with the vaccine rollout", under direction from a public but also secret "national committee", which had a starred general included.
Ive been wondering why they included him so early on.🤔🤔🤦♀️
Can we get confirmation of every rollout including military personnel around the world?
Yes, good points. Re global reach, a few points to add to your comments: in the Uk, the MHRA, the regulators admitted that they didn’t have the expertise to evaluate the novel MRNA product and were in the position of having to trust the manufacturers own declarations. In Italy a judge ordered the ingredients of the vials to be released to the court, the response was that the product was under the purview of the dept of defence, and the contents were being withheld as a matter of national security. In the EU, members of parliament demanded, as is their right, to inspect the contracts of the EU for the MRNA product; the contracts were released almost completely redacted.
Globally, the vials are all in a strict chain of custody - overseen by departments of defence; vials are not allowed to investigated by independent scientists, it is illegal to break the chain of custody, anywhere, which is unprecedented.
According to the short video, it appears that only eight (8) people out of the remaining 170 actually received the vaccine. And there were dosing issues with seven (7) out of those eight? Out of an original group of forty-four thousand (44,000) people?
I’m not in the business of organizing clinical trials for vaccines but nothing about this looks right to me.
The part you are missing is the American government has decided to move on from the concept of America. Pfizer could have submitted data handwritten on a cocktail napkin. The government thinks they are moving on without us.
Cute, but I really want to know how they twisted the numbers involved with this ‘trial’ into something that that enabled Pfizer to claim a 95% efficacy rate for an Emergency Use Authorization.
If they are unable to show how they got there then their claim of 95% efficacy is a lie and we have possible proof of fraud, and their liability protections would be invalid.
I watched the RUMBLE of Senator Ron Johnson & a panel of highly esteemed doc’s, insurance guys, the works. SO informative. Three hours of sheer brilliance— and torture. Will
I care little about their “data & science” which they’ve hidden truth and manipulated all that they couldn’t hide. The only facts we need making decisions whether or not to turn away from our government and their bureaucratic agencies is WHO WAS MANDATED TO TAKE THIS VACCINE? (The government was mostly exempt) and WHY DONT THEY CONSIDER NATURAL IMMUNITY of those who already had Covid and have active antigens, why not exempt? Because this was planned, they all took part, they signed the budget for the whole planned Covid event in the summer of 2018 which I happened to watch live on cspan. Every member of senate and Congress had/has knowledge of this planned release of Covid virus. This was just a trial run of the plan. What comes next will be devastating and you won’t see it coming most likely because too many health professionals are either still focusing on Covid and not ready for the real thing or they will be the most useful idiots going with mocking bird media and their mis/disinformation lockstep campaigns for a looming virus leak with epic devastation of this millennia!
The short video is not too convincing. So from many thousands, only 170 or so caught covid, nearly all in the placebo arm, suggesting the vax worked. However of the 160+ a handful were a bit iffy, like only taking one dose (but it still worked?) too long between doses (but it still worked?) or received a blood transfusion or wotnot? Meh.
None of that is particularly damning for something rushed through at warp speed as an emergency.
The jabs are toxic, ineffective crap, I agree, but this presentation does not undermine them very well.
I'd concentrate more on how they only tested with young people who were not at risk anyway, they didn't test pregnant women, that so many dropped out after a single dose (why? What happened? Were they injured? Where are the records for THAT?) and Pfizer's track record for lying and fraud, plus it was the drug companies in charge of ALL trials and experiments, with zero independent oversight.
Instead we're to be excited that they (foxes in charge of their own henhouse) declared it a go upon reaching a predetermined statistical significant goal, when a few of those 170 were still a bit iffy or imperfect?
If faint praise is an insult, then faint insult is praise, and this feels like they're praising the warp-speed saviors of humanity.
I do see where you are coming from, I believe. You are correct about all that. However, Kunadhasan was speaking only to the statistical bullshit Pfizer manipulated and invented to come up with the 95% efficacy within the 7 days after the 14-day period of reaching "vaccinated" status after the 2nd jab. Utterly ridiculous to use a 7-day period! Pfizer was so sloppy, so incompetent (they and their contract trialing centers), so barely going through the motions. Pfizer couldn't complete a straightforward lightweight protocol?! Pfizer had umpteen "amendments" and "deviations" and then rather detectably fabricated to reach the minimal number to do statistics (that FDA, etc. didn't bat an eye... Wow. Talk about collaborating, not just complicit!). Pfizer says they followed for 3 months but they actually didn't - their trialing took place over 3 months. Depending on the intervals between jab 1 and jab 2 the longest observation period was 62 days, and most of it was around 39-42 days. No follow up after the 7-day period if they could avoid it, if I understood.
Yeah, perhaps the worst I know about was how when the PFizer vial contents turned out to be 50/50 if they were intact or not, they lowered the required specs to 50%!
So they cheated and lied.
So they cheated and lied, then cheated and lied about cheating and lying. And now somehow, though numerous countries are ending the vax, at least in children, tightening the reins on the entire thing, WE in the USA are doubling down, still saying get it, get it, get it and give it to your kids. HOW can this go on? HOW can they sleep at night? HOW have so
many been so duped?
You may be onto something. A good friend, a nurse, when confronted (diplomatically) w/ data on ALL-CAUSE mortality & infertility actually said, “If we’d all just stop trying to prove ourselves
right, we could actually cure people.” Whaaat…? I used to
think she was really
sharp.
How does your friend propose to cure people? Iver and HCQ? If so, that would be lovely!
If she's implying that the jabs cure anyone, then she is probably hopelessly deluded.
Please cross refer with Katherine Watt of Baileick news; the documents Pfizer provided in the Brook Jackson whistleblower case show that the trials were purposely a facade; under the ‘other transaction authority’ with the DOD, those contracts super-ceded other contracts; there was (pseudo) legally no need to prove ‘safe & effective’ … as they are ‘counter-measures’ rather than pharmaceutical products. CDC are actually out of the loop and are ‘role-playing’ in terms of regulation.
I agree with Katherines meticulous assessment but I can't reconcIle This context on a multi country scenario. This is global. Every country had its individual contract with its individual regulatory body and Pfizer et al. Yes, it's possible all other countries followed the FDA and CDC resolutions (so these individual bodies can be held accountable, per individual countries laws, for malfeasance and negligence), but your talking about EVERY countries military being involved as well.
However, I think your on to something because Australia's defence force was conscripted to "help with the vaccine rollout", under direction from a public but also secret "national committee", which had a starred general included.
Ive been wondering why they included him so early on.🤔🤔🤦♀️
Can we get confirmation of every rollout including military personnel around the world?
Yes, good points. Re global reach, a few points to add to your comments: in the Uk, the MHRA, the regulators admitted that they didn’t have the expertise to evaluate the novel MRNA product and were in the position of having to trust the manufacturers own declarations. In Italy a judge ordered the ingredients of the vials to be released to the court, the response was that the product was under the purview of the dept of defence, and the contents were being withheld as a matter of national security. In the EU, members of parliament demanded, as is their right, to inspect the contracts of the EU for the MRNA product; the contracts were released almost completely redacted.
Globally, the vials are all in a strict chain of custody - overseen by departments of defence; vials are not allowed to investigated by independent scientists, it is illegal to break the chain of custody, anywhere, which is unprecedented.
Sounds plausible
They lied about everything else. Surprise! 🙄
I must be missing something here.
According to the short video, it appears that only eight (8) people out of the remaining 170 actually received the vaccine. And there were dosing issues with seven (7) out of those eight? Out of an original group of forty-four thousand (44,000) people?
I’m not in the business of organizing clinical trials for vaccines but nothing about this looks right to me.
Am I missing something?
The part you are missing is the American government has decided to move on from the concept of America. Pfizer could have submitted data handwritten on a cocktail napkin. The government thinks they are moving on without us.
Cute, but I really want to know how they twisted the numbers involved with this ‘trial’ into something that that enabled Pfizer to claim a 95% efficacy rate for an Emergency Use Authorization.
If they are unable to show how they got there then their claim of 95% efficacy is a lie and we have possible proof of fraud, and their liability protections would be invalid.
See my point?
Your not missing. It was simply that ridiculous of a study. It was a joke. And it was inconceivable that it "passed" muster.🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️
https://rumble.com/v1ze4d0-covid-19-vaccines-what-they-are-how-they-work-and-possible-causes-of-injuri.html
GREAT stuff! Addresses darned near everything.
Welcome back! Thank you for this post! 🧐 Knowledge is power …
https://open.substack.com/pub/warnermendenhall/p/federal-covid-contracts?r=pebn3&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post
I watched the RUMBLE of Senator Ron Johnson & a panel of highly esteemed doc’s, insurance guys, the works. SO informative. Three hours of sheer brilliance— and torture. Will
find the
link.
First, welcome back from your happy hiatus! Second, thank you for continuing to expose the egregious lies, cheating, and more lies.
I care little about their “data & science” which they’ve hidden truth and manipulated all that they couldn’t hide. The only facts we need making decisions whether or not to turn away from our government and their bureaucratic agencies is WHO WAS MANDATED TO TAKE THIS VACCINE? (The government was mostly exempt) and WHY DONT THEY CONSIDER NATURAL IMMUNITY of those who already had Covid and have active antigens, why not exempt? Because this was planned, they all took part, they signed the budget for the whole planned Covid event in the summer of 2018 which I happened to watch live on cspan. Every member of senate and Congress had/has knowledge of this planned release of Covid virus. This was just a trial run of the plan. What comes next will be devastating and you won’t see it coming most likely because too many health professionals are either still focusing on Covid and not ready for the real thing or they will be the most useful idiots going with mocking bird media and their mis/disinformation lockstep campaigns for a looming virus leak with epic devastation of this millennia!
The video isn't that long, ~ 28 minutes.
The short video is not too convincing. So from many thousands, only 170 or so caught covid, nearly all in the placebo arm, suggesting the vax worked. However of the 160+ a handful were a bit iffy, like only taking one dose (but it still worked?) too long between doses (but it still worked?) or received a blood transfusion or wotnot? Meh.
None of that is particularly damning for something rushed through at warp speed as an emergency.
The jabs are toxic, ineffective crap, I agree, but this presentation does not undermine them very well.
I'd concentrate more on how they only tested with young people who were not at risk anyway, they didn't test pregnant women, that so many dropped out after a single dose (why? What happened? Were they injured? Where are the records for THAT?) and Pfizer's track record for lying and fraud, plus it was the drug companies in charge of ALL trials and experiments, with zero independent oversight.
Instead we're to be excited that they (foxes in charge of their own henhouse) declared it a go upon reaching a predetermined statistical significant goal, when a few of those 170 were still a bit iffy or imperfect?
If faint praise is an insult, then faint insult is praise, and this feels like they're praising the warp-speed saviors of humanity.
I do see where you are coming from, I believe. You are correct about all that. However, Kunadhasan was speaking only to the statistical bullshit Pfizer manipulated and invented to come up with the 95% efficacy within the 7 days after the 14-day period of reaching "vaccinated" status after the 2nd jab. Utterly ridiculous to use a 7-day period! Pfizer was so sloppy, so incompetent (they and their contract trialing centers), so barely going through the motions. Pfizer couldn't complete a straightforward lightweight protocol?! Pfizer had umpteen "amendments" and "deviations" and then rather detectably fabricated to reach the minimal number to do statistics (that FDA, etc. didn't bat an eye... Wow. Talk about collaborating, not just complicit!). Pfizer says they followed for 3 months but they actually didn't - their trialing took place over 3 months. Depending on the intervals between jab 1 and jab 2 the longest observation period was 62 days, and most of it was around 39-42 days. No follow up after the 7-day period if they could avoid it, if I understood.
Yeah, perhaps the worst I know about was how when the PFizer vial contents turned out to be 50/50 if they were intact or not, they lowered the required specs to 50%!